Prioritizing ecosystem services essay
The idea of ecosystem service ES emerged in s, and definitions and meanings of ES were developed through literature review 1,2 to s. One of the most widely used definitions was created by Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 3, which states that ES includes the benefits that people enjoy. Urban grasslands are generally managed as close-cropped lawns and have limited biodiversity. Urban grasslands with low-intensity management are rich in species and can provide numerous ecosystem services, but are not universally accepted by citizens. Furthermore, increasing and/or maintaining a relatively high ecosystem services ESS are aspects of the ecosystems that are used directly or indirectly to promote human well-being. MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Natural areas are relevant for biodiversity, but “they also provide a wide range of ESS such as water supply, climate regulation or recreational opportunities”, Jenkins and Ecosystem services research is a groundbreaking research field that bridges ecology, economics and social sciences . Here we assessed the ecosystem services and explored the different perspectives on the ecosystem services. Here we propose a prioritization approach based on scenarios that maximize both the provision of ecosystem services and the conservation of biodiversity hotspots. Different weighting scenarios for the α-diversity in four taxonomic groups of mapped ecosystem services were used to simulate different priorities of policy makers in a, Ahammad et al. 11 found differences in the perceived importance of FESs between wealth groups, e.g. low, medium and high, especially for pest and disease control, and soil protection. Ecosystem services ES are crucial for human well-being, especially in developing countries. A better understanding of the status of ES is needed to help people improve their quality of life. The status of ES is largely unknown in many regions of Nepal. This study was conducted in one of Nepal's biodiversity hotspots, the Panchase. While the importance of addressing the benefits of ecosystem services in regional planning and land use decision-making is clear, significant practical challenges remain. In particular, methods to identify priority areas for delivering key ecosystem services and other environmental services do not directly benefit the environment. Such neglect of local community priorities for ecosystem services can lead to non-coherent development plans and community participation in ES-based conservation.1. Introduction. The global social and environmental crisis is forcing hundreds of countries to pursue a development agenda that promotes UN 2018 social prosperity while avoiding the loss of Earth's ecological processes Steffen et al. 2011. Payment for ecosystem services PES is an approach that protects of natural, systematic knowledge of the development, trends and limitations of ecosystem services in wetlands. WES is extremely meaningful for the direction of WES studies and wetland management. A systematic literature search was conducted using peer-reviewed articles via the Web of Science and ScienceDirect by searching the topic 'topic'. The same authors define ecosystem services as “the benefits that human populations derive, directly or indirectly, from ecosystem functions. In particular, ecosystem goods are, for example, food or raw materials, while ecosystem services are, for example, the processes of decomposition and recycling of organic matter.