What is intellectual property philosophy essay
The question of whether and how intellectual objects should be protected by legal property rights is of course controversial, but so is the question of whether intellectual content can properly be characterized as 'property'. It is crucial to note that the concept of property also has descriptive or factual content: I challenge and argue for this characterization in a discussion that draws on aesthetic theory, legal and philosophical theories of intellectual property, rhetorical analysis, and research on field of intellectual property. political economy of new media, that the formation of proprietary digital art markets by emerging commercial platforms such as Monegraph and Intellectual Property is generally characterized as non-physical property that is the product of original thought. Typically, rights do not surround the abstract, non-physical entity, but intellectual property rights surround the control over physical manifestations or expressions of ideas. Intellectual property law protects a content creator. Professor Annabelle Lever is a political philosopher best known for her work on privacy and democracy. This makes her an unlikely editor for a work on the philosophy of intellectual property, but it seems to have been an inspired decision. The world of intellectual property law can sometimes be quite isolated.6. Moral desert theory. According to Locke, “every man has a property in his own person,” that is, the fruit of one man's labor belongs to him alone. Intellectual property rights also follow the same pattern because the innovator earns this right because of his intellectual and physical labor.Tel: 44 0, Fax: 44 0. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property is a recent and excellent addition to the Dartmouth Series in Applied Legal Philosophy. The purpose of this series, as explained by the series editor, Tom Campbell, is to publish work that takes a theoretical approach to the study of particular areas. One approach, from philosophy, criticizes the argument that intellectual property rights are illegal because they deplete the information commons and finds this view inadequate. A Second Approach, 6. Moral Desert Theory. According to Locke, “every man has a property in his own person,” that is, the fruit of one man's labor belongs to him alone. Intellectual property rights also follow the same pattern, as the innovator earns this right because of his intellectual and physical labor. Intellectual property is generally characterized as non-physical property that is the product of original thought. Typically, rights do not surround the abstract, non-physical entity, but intellectual property rights surround the control over physical manifestations or expressions of ideas. throughout the book and throughout the rest of this book. The circular nature of rights philosophy was discussed by F. Cohen in his essay Transcendental Nonsense. There is no such thing as 'intellectual property'; it's a mirage. The only reason people think it makes sense as a coherent category is because the widespread use of the term has misled them about the laws in question. The term 'intellectual property' is at best a catch-all term for lumping together various laws. I challenge and argue for this characterization in a discussion that combines aesthetic theory, legal and philosophical theories of intellectual property, rhetorical analysis, and research in the political field. economics of new media, that the formation of native digital art markets by emerging commercial platforms such as Monegraph,