Was the Mongol Empire a good or bad history essay
So you admit that your comment was simplistic nonsense about the Empire - for years or so it wasn't simply shooting people as they invaded. In fact, the British Empire, which was never militarily dominant, grew in many and varied ways. History Craft said: And yes, for centuries they used violence to dominate. The sites of the Mongol tribes during the Khitan Liao dynasty 907-1125 Photo by Khiruge CC BY - 0. Although there is no escaping the fact that this empire was forged by violent Britain's public discussion of its imperial past revolved around a limiting question: was the empire good or bad? included in the National Curriculum,” while Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, article. The diet of the Mongols was heavily influenced by their nomadic way of life, which dominated dairy products and meat from their herds of sheep, goats, oxen, camels and yaks. Thanks to foraging and hunting, fruits, vegetables, herbs and wild game were added. Once they established their empire, the Mongols came into contact with it. At the end of the twelfth and beginning of the thirteenth century, a leader named Temujin arose in Mongolia, who was able to unite the various nomadic tribes and declare a Mongol empire. see here in this yellow color. Ultimately, he is the Mongol Empire, 1227. The Mongols recognized the value of human resources. Typically, when a population was subjugated, only soldiers and aristocrats, people who were potentially dangerous and relatively useless respectively, were killed. The rest were moved outside the city walls to facilitate orderly looting. This focus, which is mainly attributed to the works of Thomas T. Allsen, also means that scholarly literature now gives more space to topics that interest world historians, such as the cultural, economic, religious and artistic exchanges that prevailed in Mongolian Eurasia, or the legacy that the Mongol Empire left to the early modern empires.