What are the strengths and weaknesses of using biography, autobiography, and oral history as historical sources? essay
A biography is an account of a person's life story written by an author who is not the subject of the corner. An autobiography, on the other hand, involves an individual narrating their own life. Experimenting and theorizing about forms of life, writing from the field of history has grown significantly in recent decades, as historians understand how autobiographical narratives can contribute to understanding both the past and the past. our processes to access it. The introduction to this special issue on 'History and Autobiography' outlines. Oral history is an account of the past that is passed on orally. It has made an important contribution to the way we understand and interpret the past. Today, oral history has become an important field of study. Oral histories are also central to indigenous cultures, both historical and contemporary. Histories of the Selfinterrogates historians work with personal stories. It introduces students and researchers to a scholarly approach to diaries, letters, oral history and memoirs as sources that provide access to intimate aspects of the past. Historians are more interested in how people thought and felt about their lives than ever before. The Oral History Association defines oral history as a “method of collecting, preserving, and interpreting the voices and memories of people, communities, and participants in past events.” It is one of the oldest ways of retelling historical events. For Indigenous peoples in Canada consisting of First Nations, Inuit and M tis peoples. Biographical and autobiographical studies have managed to maintain a foothold in the scholarly arenas of educational history and educational research, which are increasingly dominated by the concerns, approaches, and orientations of the social sciences and social scientists. One reason for this foothold is that biography and autobiography,