Morality of animal testing Philosophy essay
Empirical studies of the social lives of nonhuman primates, cetaceans, and other social animals have prompted scientists and philosophers to debate whether morality and moral cognition exist in nonhuman animals. Some researchers have argued that morality exists in different species, others argue that these are animal rights arguments. The only major ethical argument against animal research that remains is based on the idea of rights. Just as humans have inalienable rights, the argument goes, so do animals. According to this view, the use of animals in research can never be justified for exactly the same reasons that we cannot. Cora Diamond is one of the most imaginative and interesting philosophers working today. She is best known for her work on Wittgenstein and in the field of moral philosophy; both types of essays appear in The Realistic Spirit MIT Press, 1995. Although she has written on the early and late Wittgenstein, it is her reading of the Tractatus. This review essay considers five recent books that address the ethical dimensions of human-animal relations. The books are David Favre, Respecting Animals: A Balanced Approach to our Relationship with Pets, Food, and Wildlife, TJ Kasperbauer, Subhuman: The Moral Psychology of Human Attitudes to Animals, Ben Minteer, The, The strategy of the book is to argue that animals have emotions, and that some of these emotions take the form of moral concern directed toward others, because the emotions have identifiable moral content. Therefore, animals should be regarded as moral subjects. This does not mean that they can be moral agents. Resume. This article calls on virtue ethics to help guide animal research by considering the role of character and flourishing in these practices. Philosophical approaches to the ethics of animal research have typically focused on animal rights or on promoting the welfare of all involved, while animal research itself has. Morality's Progress summarizes nearly thirty years of work by a leading figure in the fields of environmental ethics and bioethics. The twenty-two articles here are stimulatingly diverse, but together they tell a unified story about different aspects of the morality of our relationships with animals and nature. Jamieson's direct and accessible essays, 1. The Moral Considerability of Animals. To say that a being deserves moral consideration is to say that this being has a moral claim on those who can recognize such claims. A morally significant being is a being who can be wronged in a morally relevant sense. Animal testing, also known as animal testing, is the use of non-human animals for scientific research. It involves subjecting animals to various procedures, such as surgical procedures, injections and exposure to toxic substances, to study their physiological and behavioral responses. The subject of animal testing is from, 609, 2001 Cite this article. Why animal testing is important: the use of animals in medical research. E.F. Paul and J. Paul. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, USA. 2001.