Kant and Mill Ethical Theories Philosophy Essay
This comprehensive analysis compares the ethical theories of John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant, specifically focusing on utilitarianism and categorical, compare Mill and Kant's ethical theories, creating a better social order. John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed in an ethical theory known as utilitarianism; Virtue ethics is an ethical theory that emphasizes the character of the moral agent. It differs from other ethical theories, such as utilitarianism and deontology, because it focuses on the development of the individual's character and the understanding of the virtues that make up good character. This theory states that a good two ethical theories, deontology and utilitarianism, offer views on the ways in which people are obligated to act, based on the morality of each theory. These theories are mainly supported by two philosophers, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. These philosophers support conflicting ideals, and although both of these theories exist, autonomy is the source of all obligations, moral or non-moral, as it is the ability to impose on ourselves, by virtue of our practical identity, obligations to act. Traditional critiques of autonomy-based moral views, and Kant's in particular, have been constructed along several lines.