Law of Evidence Analysis of Similar Fact Law of Evidence essay
SIMILAR FACTS EVIDENCE. Provided for in S.16 of the Evidence Act. S: 16: Facts proving the existence of a state of mind, or of a body, or of bodily feeling. S. 17: Facts relating to whether an act was accidental or intentional. This refers to evidence of previous or subsequent actions that are similar to the facts in question or a relevant, Law Of Evidence Analysis Or Similar Fact Evidence Law Essay. Medieval views of evidence in the age of trial by ordeal would be completely foreign to modern sensibilities. There is no approach to evidence that is shared by all the legal systems of the world today. Under the common law it has long been established that judges have a general discretion to order the exclusion of technically admissible evidence if they consider that its prejudicial effect exceeds its probative value, see for example Christie 1914. In Sang 1980 the House of Lords this unanimously to meet the overarching purpose. This entry focuses on the modern concept of evidence operating in the legal tradition to which Anglo-American law belongs. 1 It focuses on evidence in relation to the proof of factual claims in law. 2 It may seem obvious that there must exist a legal concept of evidence distinct from the ordinary concept of evidence. The authors followed the same chapter format as before: Schwikkard covered character evidence, comparable fact, evidence, private privilege, hearsay, a selection of common law exceptions to the hearsay rule, selected statutory exceptions to the rule, informal confessions. An example of such a rule is that on similar facts. The rationale for regulation will be explored through two types of analyses. Traditionally, an external approach is chosen. There are.