Sweatshop essay
The essay's rhetorical devices include juxtaposing the views of middle-class and lower-class individuals and outlining the role sweatshops play in eradicating poverty. In addition, the author explains the term 'sweatshop' and points out the problem of a lack of manufacturing jobs in developing countries. Sweatshops are a source of employment, an opportunity to improve lifestyle and help developing countries improve their situation. Firstly, Sweatshop provides employment. Women feel a bit of independence through their work. Sweatshops mainly provide employment to women. “For example, in one of the clothing industries, a sweatshop employee tells her story. Arifa started working in the garment factories of Bangladesh at the age of 10. She grew up in a city outside the capital Dhaka and had to find a job when her father could no longer work. She has worked in the sector for years. When she first started working, Arifa was a helper and earned sweatshops in Bangladesh. In Bangladesh, workers and factories produce goods for export to the world market, mainly Europe and North America. This article argues that a sweatshop worker's choice to accept the terms of his or her employment is morally important, both as an exercise of autonomy and as an expression of preference. This fact establishes a moral claim against interference in the conditions of sweatshop labor by third parties such as governments or consumers. In the column “Where Sweatshops Are a Dream” of January 15, Nicholas D. Kristof is absolutely right. Sweatshops are much better than a sharp stick in the eye. But if jobs are not a way out.