Why should people obey the state philosophy essay
Whether we should obey the law is a question that affects everyone's daily lives, from traffic laws to taxes. Most people obey out of habit, but the question remains: why are we morally obligated to do so? If we do not comply, the state can force compliance, but is it right for it to do so, and if so, why? book, George Klosko, a. In other words, the state has the characteristic of maximizing utility. We are better off with a government we all obey than not – and each of us has a moral obligation to do what best supports people's prosperity. Therefore, they are all immoral sinners and lawbreakers. It is impossible to be law-abiding enough to avoid this predicament. And true saints are always the first to admit this fact. So to answer the question: No, it is not moral to obey the law. It is only moral to obey God's law because God is the origin of universal morality. Why we obey. When I was a new Christian, I learned that I owed obedience to the Lord in every area of life. Still, I was a little confused as to why I was obeying. When asked for an explanation, I answered three ways, which we can call the way of wisdom, the way of trust and the way of gratitude. The way of wisdom says that it is only reasonable to obey God's law. Civil disobedience, given its place on the borderline of fidelity to the law, would, on this view, fall between legal protest on the one hand and conscientious refusal, impolite disobedience. militant protest, organized violent resistance and revolutionary action, on the other hand. This image of civil disobedience, and the broader stories. According to the philosopher Sren Kierkegaard d. 1855, deep down, a person can lead one of three lives: the aesthetic life, the ethical life or the religious life. A person who directs the. When breaking the law, one must know the punishment. Civil disobedience is the intentional breaking of a law or refusal to cooperate with the government. If the law is based on an unjust opinion, I think most would agree that it is okay to go against the law. To what extent you want to resist the law is more a matter of. The discussion of instrumentalism below will say something more about this criticism. The most demanding understanding of authority is the idea of a political authority that has a right to rule that correlates with a duty of obedience owed to the authority and that is a substantively independent and preventive duty. Faced with a choice between escaping without consequences and submitting to a democratic decision, Socrates chooses the latter. Socrates' duty to obey the law is so immense, we are led to believe, that even the threat of death is not sufficient to abolish it. Crito presents several arguments that attempt to substantiate Socrates' strong foundation. According to the most widely accepted account of civil disobedience, famously championed by John Rawls in 1971, civil disobedience is a public, non-violent, and conscientious violation of the law, undertaken for the purpose of changing laws or government policies. For this reason, for those who engage in civil disobedience, referring them to another authority that is itself unlimited would be just to displace the seat of absolute sovereignty, a position entirely consistent with Hobbes's emphasis on absolutism. To..