A case review Padilla V Kentucky Law essay
The Kentucky Supreme Court provides interpretations of state law and establishes rules of practice and procedure for members of the Kentucky legal profession. The Court reviews cases involving the death penalty, life imprisonment or a prison sentence of years after direct appeal to the court. The Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, which identified deportation as a punishment directly related to the criminal process, has generated a wealth of scholarly knowledge, especially regarding the. In Two Concepts of Freedom of Speech, professor Kathleen Sullivan notes that Citizens United maps the philosophical divide between competing views on freedom of speech. The 'free speech-as-equality' camp reads the First Amendment to allow speech rules that promote political equality, while Louisiana's 'free speech-as-equality' legislature passes a law allowing surgical castration as punishment for child sex crimes. As Summer Approaches Some Early Commentary on Donald Trump's Impending Conviction The U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Padilla v. Kentucky seems fairly simple and precise: Sixth Amendment standards were applied to noncitizen Jose's claim Padilla said his criminal defense attorney was ineffective due to allegedly incorrect advice about the risk of deportation. This was a very important step at #08: the Supreme Court of the United States. JOSE PADILLA, PETITIONER. v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. BY WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY. BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING THE AFFIRMATION. ELENA KAGAN Attorney General of, as we previously discussed here, Padilla v. Kentucky ruled that an attorney's failure to inform a criminal defendant of the reasonably observable consequences of a guilty plea on the deportation status of the defendant was a deprivation of the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. But to what extent will that principle be applied Gabriel Chin,