Comparative Analysis of Eigrp and Ospf Routing Information Technology Essay
This article evaluates the performance of routing protocols such as OSPF, EIGRP, and IS-IS in an enterprise network. Routing protocols are rules that determine the best route for transferring data between different networks. Compared to OSPF and EI GRP. RIP for convergence with variance. 86, OSPF. with variance. 38, and while as EIGRP. variance. Four typical types of UMTS routing protocols. have been chosen in this article to compare RIP, Routing Information Protocol, OSPF Open Shortest Path First, IGRP Interior Gateway. In a network and in OSPF there is no limit of routers, in EIGRP routers can be used. So rip. routing is valid for small networks and so is EIGRP. only implemented on cisco routers. So. OSPF and EIGRP will distribute routing information between routers in the same autonomous system. This research will find out how the routing protocol works and compare these dynamic routing protocols. Here a comparison is made between different parameters and a detailed simulation study is carried out on the network with different routing protocols. EIGRP has been shown to provide better network convergence. time, reduced bandwidth requirements, and better CPU and memory usage compared to OSPF and RIP; On the Internet, the routing of a data packet is the most important process. A routing protocol specifies the path to a router so that it can be connected to the internetwork using a protocol called an Internet protocol. Internet applications use many routing protocols such as RIPvl, RIPv2, OSPF, EIGRP, IGRP, etc. Every time they use routing OSPF and EIGRP, OSPF is routed. connection loop, where a connection can be made to the next route. membagi jaringan yang besar menjadi. Comparison of route redistribution on dynamic routing protocol EIGRP in OSPF and EIGRP in IS-IS. th, International Conference on Information Technology and Engineering. EIGRP vs OSPF: Algorithm. EIGRP is based on the DUAL Diffusing Update Algorithm, while OSPF uses Dijkstra's Shortest Path Algorithm, the major difference being the way they calculate the shortest routing path. Shortest Path relies only on bandwidth for the metric calculation of the cost of a given link, while DUAL uses bandwidth and delay,