Subepithelial connective tissue transplantation Health and social care essay
Objective: The gold standard for soft tissue augmentation around implants is a subepithelial connective tissue graft CTG, but the xenogeneic collagen matrices XCM have been used as an alternative. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of XCM compared to CTG for increasing soft tissue thickness. This study evaluated the annual results of the subepithelial connective tissue graft SCTG plus envelope type flap modified coronal advanced flap mCAF or coronal advanced tunnel flap KATF. the subepithelial connective tissue graft is considered the gold standard for periodontal plastic surgery, especially in long-term follow-up. from both the receiver. The success of the subepithelial connective tissue graft is attributed to the dual blood supply to the recipient site from the underlying connective tissue base and the overlying recipient flap. The donor site is a closed wound, which causes less postoperative discomfort. In addition, excellent color mixing can be achieved. The rationale behind using a subepithelial connective tissue graft for recession coverage is that this technique combines the free gingival graft and the pedicle flap. Regardless of the amount of attached gingiva present, the free autogenous connective tissue is readily available from the palate or the edentulous ridge and pedicle available in situ. Currently, subepithelial connective tissue grafts SCTG remain the most reliable techniques used to cover exposed root surfaces. This article discusses patient selection and the many surgical procedures. Background: An improvement in clinical parameters together with regeneration is the desired outcome of periodontal therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze and contrast the efficacy of combined open flap debridement OFD and subepithelial connective tissue transplantation SECTG to OFD in the treatment of periodontal diseases. Background: The aim of this study was to histologically evaluate the healing and revascularization of subepithelial connective tissue transplantation in dogs. Methods: Six beagle dogs were used in this study. Recession defects were surgically created on maxillary left P right P2, and maxillary and mandibular left central and. The defects were chronicled and two types of barriers were randomly performed for guided tissue regeneration in a split-mouth design: the test group with a subepithelial connective tissue graft. Background: Immediate implantation, despite many advantages, carries a risk of gingival recession, papilla loss, margin contour collapse, and other aesthetic complications. Soft tissue graft placement in combination with immediate implantation can be used to alleviate these concerns. This review aims to systematically analyze the clinical situation,