ASEAN Balance of Power Strategies Political Essay
This research is important because the literature on middle powers assumes that they have significant persuasive powers, but does not explain how such persuasive capabilities are developed. This research applies the framework of legitimation strategies to the case of Indonesia's promotion of the ASEAN vision of the Indo-Pacific AOIP. The author argues that Southeast Asian governments have generally turned away from traditional balance-of-power politics and promoted a more complex 'balance of influence' that includes military, economic, institutional and ideational dimensions. An important feature of this strategy of balancing influence is its inclusiveness. A balance of power system is a system in which the power that states possess and exercise within the system is checked and balanced by the power of others. So as the power of a nation grows to the point. Murray Hiebert, Under Beijing's Shadow: Southeast Asia's China Challenge Lanham, MD: Center for Strategic and International Studies and Rowman amp Littlefield, 2020. David Shambaugh, Where Great Powers Meet: America and China in Southeast Asia New York: Oxford University Press, 2021 . Sebastian Strangio, In the Dragon's, historical examples include: Inclusive and exclusive efforts by Third World states and the superpowers to organize voting blocs in the UN during the Cold War, including institutional balance among the ASEAN states to contain China and ensure US support in ASEAN. Regional Forum ARF after the Cold War exclusively institutional. While there are voices within the U.S. strategic community who suggest that Washington should adopt an offshore balancing strategy that preserves U.S. strength until a serious challenger emerges, even proponents of such a strategy admit that the United States might have to intervene to strike a balance against Beijing because, in his words, “a fundamental challenge of the Cold War was whether American democracy could generate the power and endurance to compete with Soviet tyranny, and what model the would appeal to people all over the world. ” The competition for great power is therefore a contest between political systems based on different principles. Offensive realism characterizes the equilibrium in which the balancer directly bears the burden of maintaining the balance of power. This strategy is very clear in the enormous. “The United States: Addressing the Return to Great Power Competition,” East Asian Strategic Review, National. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, WW There are other normative and structural reasons for the lack of a hard balance, but these are of secondary importance. These include: the relative decline of territory as a source of wealth and power, the norms of nationalism and territorial non-intervention integrity acting as constraints on a potential expansionist power, the state. Seen from this perspective, China's naval power ambition is an integral part of its strategic choice to construct a great power identity. It is clear that Beijing's South China Sea policy is directly related to China's national goal of establishing the status of a "strong maritime power," which in turn would contribute to the idea of balance of power. Although ASEAN states share the idea of balance of power, they employ different mixed strategies depending on the specific issues and timing. In relations with China and the United States. This is part of the,,