Male circumcision reduces the amount of genital bacteria essay
After male, newborn, childhood, and adult non-repentances, they concluded that negative attitudes toward one's circumcision are linked to worse. Background: Male circumcision has been proven to substantially reduce men's risk of a number of sexually transmitted infections, STDs. We conducted a detailed systematic review of the scientific data. Circumcision changes the bacterial ecosystem of the penis, which may explain why the foreskin-cutting procedure reduces the risk of HIV infection, a new study finds. One year after men received. Previous randomized trials have shown that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV infection in men -60 and reduces the risk of infection with the herpes simplex virus and humans. Circumcision reduces the risk of HIV infection. In men, circumcision reduces the risk of sexually transmitted viral infections. For HIV, that risk decreases. But why this happens is unknown. The foreskin in uncircumcised men is thought to be particularly susceptible to HIV. The reason is because the foreskin contains. The human body represents a complex and diverse reservoir of microorganisms. Although the human microbiome remains poorly characterized and understood, it should not be underestimated as recent studies have highlighted its importance to health. This is especially clear when we look at the microbiota in men. In particular, the prevalence and absolute abundance of anaerobic bacterial taxa decreased significantly in the circumcised men. Although aerobic bacterial taxa also increased after circumcision, this gain was small. The reduction in anaerobes may partially explain the effects of circumcision on reduced HIV acquisition. Contrasting ethical and legal arguments have been made regarding neonatal male circumcision (NMC) that merit the first systematic review on this topic. We conducted PRISMA-compliant keyword searches of PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, LexisNexis, and other databases and articles that met the requirements. A Cochrane review of these RCTs, which included a total, showed that circumcision reduced HIV acquisition with an incidence risk ratio IRR 46 95 34-0.62 at the end of follow-up. The number needed to treat NNT - 95 -90. Circumcision HIV infections 95 CI, Results and conclusions. A systematic review of articles published in the Google Scholar and PubMed databases was conducted. It appears that viruses, as well as bacteria and parasites, are important causes of infections of the male genital organs and resulting infertility due to damage to the organs and subsequent loss of function and/or through FGM and male circumcision, in the sense that a small proportion of the cases are comparable. genitals are cut. While male circumcision cuts the foreskin, FGM cuts the clitoris by WHO, 2022. Furthermore, both practices are mainly performed to honor cultural norms and beliefs. For example, FGM is linked to cultural ideals that reflect modesty and femininity Earp, 2020. Notably, the prevalence and absolute abundance of anaerobic bacterial taxa decreased significantly in the circumcised men. Although aerobic bacterial taxa also increased after circumcision, this gain was small. The reduction in anaerobes may partially explain the effects of circumcision on reduced HIV acquisition.